Q

Get a Free Consultation

(215) 985-0777

    Spam Filter:  

    Q
    Get a Free Consultation

      Spam Filter:  

      PA Car Accident Law: Financial Compensation for Back Injuries in a Philadelphia Auto Accident

      Folks injured in car accidents in Philadelphia often hurt their backs, whether it’s a rear-end accident, an intersection accident or a pedestrian accident. Getting financial compensation for a neck, mid back or low back injury after a car accident usually depends on:

      1. what type of insurance the injured party has (full tort vs. limited tort), and
      2. whether the back injuries are “serious” under Pennsylvania law.

      In this legal article, our Philly car accident lawyers discuss the ins and outs of Pennsylvania auto accident law for back injuries after a car accident caused by another party. If you caused a car accident and were injured, the odds of receiving compensation from another party who was in the accident are pretty low. This article only applies to individuals injured in car accidents that were caused by other drivers.

      Financial Compensation Depends on the Type of Car Insurance You Have

      Pennsylvania auto insurance law is pretty complex, especially when it comes to making claims for financial compensation after a car accident. In most cases, whether you can get compensated for a back injury after a car accident in Philadelphia depends on the type of car insurance policy you have.

      Under PA law, the type of insurance you select affects your ability to get compensated for pain and suffering damages after a car accident that was caused by another party. When you buy a car insurance policy, you’re required to choose between full tort and limited tort. The selection only affects (or limits) your ability to get compensated for pain and suffering damages. You can still make a claim for financial losses like medical bills or lost wages. The limitation on pain and suffering damages is important because the financial or monetary compensation for pain and suffering can be quite sizeable.

      What’s the Difference Between Full Tort & Limited Tort?

      Under a full tort policy, the insured individual can make a claim for pain and suffering without limitation. On the other hand, with a limited tort policy, the insured individual can only make a claim for pain and suffering if the circumstances of the accident meet one of the exceptions or the individual suffered a “serious injury.”

      The exceptions to the limited tort law aren’t very common. The most common exceptions include situations where you get hit by someone driving a car that’s not registered in PA or you get hit by a drunk driver. Because these exceptions tend to be rare, what typically matters in limited tort cases is whether you suffered a “serious injury” which is defined under the law as “death, serious impairment of body function or permanent serious disfigurement.” Most limited tort cases are fought or won over whether an injury amounts to a “serious impairment of body function.”

      Let’s examine these principles as they relate to back injuries in a Philly car accident lawsuit.

      Full Tort and Back Injuries

      You’re driving to work in Philly and get rear-ended while you’re stopped at a red light in Center City. You suffer minor neck and low back injuries. Because you have a full tort policy, you get to make a claim against the at-fault driver for any pain and suffering caused by the neck and back injuries. There’s no limitation whatsoever.

      Limited Tort and Back Injuries

      You’re driving to a Phillies game and get hit by a driver who runs a red light and slams into you while you’re proceeding through an intersection. You suffer some pretty significant back injuries. If the other driver was driving a car that was registered in another state like New Jersey, you can make a claim for pain and suffering damages. Same thing applies if the other driver was drunk and was ultimately convicted of drunk driving or got accepted into an alternative disposition program for drunk drivers.

      Are Back Injuries Serious Enough?

      If none of the limited tort exceptions apply, the only way you can get financial compensation for pain and suffering from the at-fault driver is by proving that your back injuries caused a “serious impairment of body function.”

      In order to prove that your back injuries were serious enough, you have to be able to show that your daily activities were affected in a serious manner. If your back injuries prevented you from walking, driving, working, etc., then they are probably serious enough to be able to get compensated for pain and suffering.

      In limited tort cases, courts in Philadelphia routinely find that back and neck injuries can be serious enough to warrant compensation for pain and suffering. The key is presenting the right evidence.

      Situations When the Tort Election Doesn’t Matter

      There are some situations when the tort election doesn’t matter or simply doesn’t come into play. The tort election doesn’t even factor in if you’re injured in a car accident and either 1. don’t have any insurance at all (i.e., don’t own a car), or 2. aren’t covered under a relative’s car insurance policy. In such a case, you can make claims for financial compensation without any limitation.

      In addition, your tort election doesn’t matter if you get hit as a pedestrian or bike rider. You have to be physically inside a car in order for the tort election to matter.

      For more info, visit the Philadelphia Car Accident Injury Law Library. Contact our office for a FREE consultation to discuss your case. 215-985-0777

      Car accident cases accepted in Philadelphia, Delaware County, Montgomery County, and throughout other parts of Pennsylvania and New Jersey.

      FREE CONSULTATIONS (215) 985-0777

      {

      You made the whole process so easy. Not once did I ever think you didn’t have my best interest in mind or even doubted the seriousness of my issue. I felt like I could email you to get an update at any point and you got back to me so quickly.

      {
      5
      L. F.
      {

      Jordan Namerow is a lawyer who goes above and beyond. I would highly recommend him to anyone seeking legal representation on a personal injury case.

      {
      5
      April G.
      {

      I had a fabulous experience using Jordan Namerow as my attorney. He was knowledgeable, personable, honest, responsive, and best of all, easy to talk to. 

      {
      5
      Tara D.
      {

      Jordan is a great lawyer. He is very efficient, loyal and supportive. I would recommend him to anyone. He gets the job done. 

      {
      5
      Terrance M.
      {

      Mr. Jordan Namerow a very good attorney, I would recommend him in a heart beat. The company is good, just good all around. Thank you.

      {
      5
      Kim O.
      {

      I really thank you for helping me with everything, best lawyer ever.

      {
      5
      Pablo D.

      Why Can’t I Sue for Pain and Suffering After a Philadelphia Car Accident if I Have Limited Tort?

      If you were injured in a car accident, you may not be able to sue the at-fault driver because of your insurance policy. If you elected limited tort, you may not sue for pain and suffering damages unless certain exceptions apply. Learn more here.

      What is a UIM claim in Pennsylvania?

      Pennsylvania UIM claims can be filed where a negligent driver didn’t have enough insurance coverage to compensate you for your injuries and damages. But, UIM coverage is optional, and some people don’t purchase it. If you didn’t purchase UIM, you can’t make a claim.

      What Happens When a Philadelphia Driver is in a Car Accident in New Jersey?

      What happens when a Philadelphia resident and driver is injured in a car accident in New Jersey? Are his or her legal rights affected? Does their tort election on their car insurance policies affect their legal rights? See discussion here.

      Talking to Insurance Companies After a Philadelphia, PA Car Accident – Who Should You Talk To?

      By a Philadelphia Car Accident Lawyer Drivers and passengers injured in Philadelphia car accidents may receive financial compensation from the at-fault drivers' insurance company via their liability coverage.  Injured individuals may also think that their medical...

      Recent SEPTA Accident in Philadelphia Injures 42 People

      Early Tuesday morning around 12:15am, a SEPTA Norristown High Speed Line train ran into a parked train inside the 69th Street Transportation Center in Upper Darby.  The parked train did not have passengers; however, 42 people on the train, including the conductor,...